Letter to the editor: Criticism is not hate, nor is it a crime

Editor’s note: The Portager publishes letters to the editor from the community. The opinions expressed are published not because they necessarily reflect those of the publication but because we feel they contribute meaningfully to the local discourse on matters of public interest.

On July 15, the Portage County Sheriff’s Office announced a major drug bust—an impressive operation worthy of commendation. But instead of simply sharing the official press release and commending the staff involved, administrative specialist Susan Schlarb took to Facebook to add this:

“You notice the only haters of the Sheriff’s Office are criminals or supporters of criminals?! 🤔 Proof that the Sheriff and PCSO are doing their job well!!”

This kind of rhetoric from a public employee isn’t just inappropriate — it’s ridiculous and dangerous.

Schlarb seems to be referring to any of us who have publicly criticized Sheriff Zuchowski — his rhetoric, his conduct, and the behavior he tolerates from his staff — as “haters.” Not only that, but she suggests we are “criminals or supporters of criminals.”

I’ve been one of the most vocal critics of the Sheriff’s Office in recent months—echoing and raising serious concerns through public records requests, media inquiries, and peaceful protest. I’m not a criminal. So who, exactly, is she talking about?

Could it be my father — who stood beside me at these protests — who did serve time in prison more than a decade ago and has since rebuilt his life. If Schlarb includes people like him in her accusations, she’s not just being flippant — she’s rejecting the very principles of justice and rehabilitation a sheriff’s office should support.

Her comment also reveals deeply flawed logic: that one successful drug bust is somehow “proof” that the department is beyond reproach. But commendable police work doesn’t place a department above criticism. In fact, accountability and excellence go hand in hand. We can praise good work while still demanding transparency, professionalism, and ethical leadership. That doesn’t make us haters.

When public officials equate criticism with hate and criminality, they don’t just undermine public trust — they chill civic engagement. In a democracy, asking questions isn’t subversive — it’s a responsibility. Real public servants don’t fear scrutiny. They welcome it.

— Max Swartout, Kent